![]()
McGill University, Montreal, CANADA The predilection of Renaissance architects and theorists for proportional systems which are based on consonant musical intervals is well known to scholars of that period. Also well known is the skepticism which surrounds the validity of such systems today. Controversial philosophical and scientific evidence, historical misinterpretations, and subjective polemical positions may be the reason for this skepticism. However, the frequently narrow interpretation of the musical intervals analogy may be another cause. To be meaningful, the comparison between consonant musical intervals and architectural proportions must be extended beyond the parallel between a single frequency ratio of two musical pitches and a length-to-width room ratio. Since architecture is a volumetric entity, its geometric definition involves three dimensions. Bringing the length, width, and height of individual spaces, of total buildings, and even of smaller architectural components into optimal harmonic relationships may be thus considered as an essential design challenge. Alberti and Palladio seem to have been aware of that, and made recommendations for determining proportional dimensions for heights of spaces. Among them were the arithmetic, geometric, and harmonic means between dimensions which they recommended for the lengths and widths of plans for such spaces. An examination of the resulting length : height : width proportions reveals some striking parallels to the interval relationships in chords which form the constituent parts of musical harmonic structures. It shows also the evolution of Palladio's recommended proportions beyond those of Alberti, in relation to developments in tonal harmony, the Major-Minor harmonic system, in which, according to Donald Jay Grout, "...all the harmonies of a composition [are] organized in relation to a triad on the tonic supported primarily by triads on its dominant and subdominant..." and which "...had long been foreshadowed in music of the Renaissance, especially that written in the latter half of the sixteenth century." Following Palladio's recommendations, proportions based on plan ratios other than those related to the Unison, the Perfect Fourth, and the Octave are equivalent to triads from which either a Major or a Natural Minor tonality can be fully constructed. While direct analogies can be drawn between the frequency ratios of a musical chord and the dimensional ratios of a single architectural space, the differences in the intrinsic nature of the realms of sound and of space may preclude such exact analogies when larger harmonic structures of musical works and the proportional structures of entire buildings are compared. However, when it is considered that a meaningful architectural experience involves movement from space to space, a broad comparison can be made between such an experience and the experience of tonal musical compositions, where a structured sequence of varied harmonic events (chords) is revealed to the listener. A work of architecture where the spaces and/or volumes intersect at distinct angles and are therefore experienced simultaneously may be compared to a polytonal composition where the superimposition of two or more tonalities is determined by a distinct interval or intervals. In such buildings two or more proportional systems are also superimposed at a distinct angle. A number of significant twentieth-century projects demonstrate that the dynamism of the current aesthetic preference for geometric shifts and collisions in the built environment, which have their justification in the reality of the prevailing complexities in most spheres of human existence, can be revealed in such rich and apparently discordant, yet ultimately coherent geometric superimpositions. Thus instead of the arbitrary, idiosyncratic, and shallow twists displayed in the configurations of many recent, popularly promoted buildings, equally imaginative, but deeply rooted in the underlying proportional order and therefore inherently profound, spatial compositions can be achieved.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
![]() |
|